Suchergebnisse

International audience ; The article interprets literary history as a discourse involved in the identity policies of nations. From this point of view, the author presents the relations between national and comparative literary history in Slovenia. The paper outlines the origin and development of both disciplines, especially with regard to their implicit or explicit ideological underpinnings–cultural nationalism and cosmopolitanism. Until the end of the 20th century, national literary history as a "great genre" has interiorized the 19th century thrust of cultural nationalism, which also marked the institutionalization of literary historiography as a university discipline after 1919. Even though comparative literature has countered the apparently autarkic national conceptions of literary and cultural development, it produced another kind of "master narratives" through which it affirmed national identity–by providing records on the participation of Slovene literature in the "general European" currents and developmental stages. In this context, the article draws attention to the problem of belatedness of so‑called small literatures, especially in relation to the world literary system. In conclusion, the article addresses current dilemmas of literary historiography in Slovenia, which are partly specific (reticence to attempts to "reform" the discipline) and partly connected with the changes of literature and literary studies in the era of postmodern and globalization. ; Cet article interprète l'histoire littéraire comme un discours impliqué dans les politiques identitaires des nations. De ce point de vue, l'auteur présente les relations entre l'histoire littéraire nationale et l'histoire littéraire comparée en Slovénie. Sont ainsi mis en lumière l'origine et le développement de ces deux disciplines, en particulier en ce qui concerne leurs fondements idéologiques implicites ou explicites : le nationalisme culturel et le cosmopolitisme. Jusqu'à la fin du xxe siècle, l'histoire littéraire nationale en tant que « grand ...

Based on Said's understanding of literature's worldliness, Hayot's concept of literary worlds, and Cheah's interpretation of worlding, the article – itself an example of "traveling theory" (Said) – proposes to treat world literature in a "secular" perspective, i.e., as an asymmetrical world-system that conditions a transcultural and translinguistic semiosis of literary worlds. The literary world-system, which arises from and is dependent on and responsive to the modern world-system of capitalism (see Warwick Research Collective) channels interliterary exchange in a way that is homologous to the economic inequality between the centers, which are capable of accumulating surplus value, and the peripheries, which enable the global dominance of the centers by providing the market, labor, and resources for the goods produced or distributed by the centers.